Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rob Ryan's avatar

The fact that the AMIE study was double-blind is really interesting to me. I initially thought the patient-actors knew if they were talking to AMIE or a human clinician. Which intrigued me because I'd think that people talking to AMIE knowingly could be more honest and open with it because they would have no qualms with opening up to a non-human. The veneer of humanity being removed from the clinician side, could, in my opinion, lead to potentially promising honesty from patients. All that said, the studies results did intrigue me!

Expand full comment

No posts